Tensions Escalate in Lil Durk Trial Over Alleged Threats Toward Judge

November 12, 2025 4

Photo by Prince Williams/WireImage

Federal prosecutors in Los Angeles have accused Lil Durk of showing “contempt for the judicial process.” This accusation is according to an eight-page court filing. It raises new concerns about his ongoing criminal case. The document alleges that members of Durk’s OTF (Only the Family) collective have issued threats toward witnesses. Additionally, a judge and prosecutor tied to the proceedings have also been threatened.

Prosecutors are now pushing for an anonymous jury. They argue that the measure is necessary to protect jurors and ensure a fair trial. “Preventing the leaking of jurors’ personal identifying information is a paramount concern in a case where supporters have already made threats,” the filing stated. The request highlights growing unease about potential intimidation tactics surrounding the high-profile case.

Durk’s attorney, Drew Findling, has strongly opposed the idea of an anonymous jury, describing it as an overreach that risks undermining the fairness of the trial. He maintains that the presumption of innocence must guide the proceedings. According to him, transparency should not be compromised without compelling justification. “Every defendant deserves a fair and open process,” Findling said, calling the move “a drastic step.” He argues it should only be used in exceptional circumstances. He warned that treating the jury as anonymous from the outset could prejudice the panel against his client before any evidence is presented.

Murder-for-Hire Allegations

The case stems from accusations that Lil Durk orchestrated a plot to retaliate against rapper Quando Rondo. This was following the 2020 death of King Von, a close associate. Prosecutors allege Durk coordinated efforts for individuals to travel from Chicago to Los Angeles with the intent of targeting Rondo. The 2022 shooting left Rondo injured and killed his cousin, Saviay’a “Lul Pab” Robinson. Prosecutors claim the attack was an act of revenge. However, Durk’s defense team insists the allegations are based on speculation and lack substantial proof.

Written by: boominlive

Rate it